Gun Control Issues in the United States Research Paper

Gun Control Issues in the United States - Research Paper Example The national firearms act was the first act that restricted the rights to own guns. The guns were then provided to the people after complete background checking and assuring as if they really needed the gun for a fair use. The federal act of gun control was introduced in 1968, and as per this act, each gun is provided with a unique serial number that is held by the gun buyer. 1990s’ amendment then proscribes the criminals to become a gun owner and makes it essential to check the criminal record of the buyer during the sales time. Gun control opponents argue that people bearing handguns are able to defend themselves from criminal offense assuring personal safety. Whereas, the advocates of gun control suggest that increase in crime rates is an outcome of widespread ownership of the gun and ultimately bring negative consequences both in terms of private and public (Gun Control Debate 2011).   Since 1934, various federal laws have been acted out to promote federal regulation of firearms and ammunition, the constitutionality, and efficacy of which is continued to be a strong debate. Gun control proponents argue that laws and regulation to control gun ownership and holding can prohibit convicted felons, mentally challenged and other individuals who are not safe to the society to misuse guns to create harm. The advocates of gun control also suggest that accessibility of guns to these high-risk individuals can successfully be reduced by only the federal regulations and policies for gun usage. Some people even sought for extensive modifications in gun control policy such as non-police handgun possession and the registration of all firearm owners or firearms should be prohibited almost exclusively. For this prohibitive act regarding firearms, they insist that such regulation is not barred by the constitution and it does not incur any substantial social costs. Some proponents do not consider such strict policies rather they go for moderate policy alternatives suc h as the ones which would not hinder legitimate possession and transfer of firearms. The opponents of such federal policies have much stronger arguments. They refuse to accept that federal regulation can prevent firearms access by high-risk persons. They argue against the gun control acts indicating that such controls often disturb law observant citizens by creating burdens on them. Some people consider these policies as a violation of constitutional rights catered by the Second Amendment. They even give reasons for their opposition to gun control by demonstrating that they consider the widespread possession of the gun as one of the best impediments to criminal offenses and to likely despotism as well, whether through the use of guns by gangs or by the government. Some opponents may also criticize the impression of enhancing federal powers as opposed to state and police forces (Gun Control 2002). Gun control had been considered a prominent issue neither in the 2004 Presidential camp aign nor in the 2008 campaign.  Ã‚  

Future of Employee Training and Development -3 Research Paper

Future of Employee Training and Development -3 - Research Paper Example Several organizations, therefore, use a large percentage of their resources for permanent and continuous employee training and advancement. Organizations that are constantly developing knowledge, extending it to the entire organization, and implementing it inside the new technology develop high quality products and excellent services. These activities portray the company as a learning institution with constant innovation in its business activities. These are organizations that have realized that learning and employee development is a key determinant for their business. The increasing complexity and uncertainty of the business environment requires different and advanced knowledge. Modern business activities require improved skills and knowledge that are still inadequately present in the formal school education. The gap between business requirements and training acquired at school is increasing. Current customers are highly selective, and organizations cannot continue with mass product ion. Increased and sophisticated customer demands require new solutions and knowledge. Organizations have to constantly revise their products and service mix due to increasing competition. Dynamic competition, sophisticated technology, knowledge economy, and globalization have changed the importance of employee training in organizations (Gitman and McDaniel, 2009). Differences between organizations are caused by differences in human capital. This has transformed employee knowledge and development to become the most reliable source of competitive advantage. Other factors of production are still valid, but employee skills are more relevant in the current environment. Employee training and development has become an important aspect for future organizational development. Learning and developmen